This is from Life Site news.
More than 77,000 girls have already joined cub scouts, a program for younger children since it started to welcome girls last year.
BSA Director Royce Fox in Johnson City told WJHL that in the Tri-Cities region, two girl troops are expected to be the first in that region.
In May 2018, the Boy Scouts — the program for 11- to 17-year-olds — announced it would change its name to Scouts BSA in February.
The parent organization will remain the Boy Scouts of America, and the Cub Scouts — its program serving children from kindergarten through fifth grade — will keep its title, as well.
[Ed note: well dud BSA Inc couldn’t change its name if it wanted to change it — it’s literally set by an Act of Congress, signed by the President of the United States, under Title 36 of the U.S. Code, “Patriotic Organizations.”]
In November 2018, The Girl Scouts of the United States of America filed a trademark infringement lawsuit against the Boy Scouts of America for dropping the word “boy” from its flagship program in an effort to attract girls.
Here’s an outstanding essay from Bill Thompson, editorial page editor of Waxahchietx’ newspaper, “The Ledger.”
Meanwhile, February has produced a wave of stories from across the country about the formation of all-girl Boy Scout troops. As of Feb. 1, the Scouts began accepting girls from fifth grade on, and young ladies are responding in droves to remake an institution that for a century chartered a rite for passage for countless young American males.
After reading it — and it’s very mild accepting all feminist canards — ask yourself, “What about the boys?”
Indeed, their identity has just been destroyed, castrated before their voices changed.
Not one single GoGrrl or PhD Mom has given a damn about the harm done to our boys or the dreams and validation stolen from them in an orgy of selfish appropriation.
Damn the Boy Scouts of America Inc to hell for what they’ve done.
Editorial Page Editor
The Ledger, Lakeland, Fla
Feb 27, 2019 at 10:07 PM
Last month both Gillette and the American Psychological Association tackled “toxic masculinity.”
Gillette suggested in a controversial commercial that all men, except for those sufficiently “woke,” are sexual deviants, bullies, or some other form of knuckle-dragging lowlife unfit for civil society.
The APA, meanwhile, issued a paper saying “socialization for conforming to traditional” — read toxic — “masculinity ideology” had stunted men emotionally, made them more prone to violence and subsequently discipline, caused health problems that routinely shortened their lifespans, and produced other unwelcome outcomes.
The APA’s solution: more men need to have their heads examined.
On Thursday, the Health and Human Services committee of the South Dakota House killed a bill that would have protected the right of parents to refuse to consent to medical or psychological treatment for a child suffering from gender dysphoria if the treatment “would induce, confirm, or promote the child’s belief that the child’s sex or gender identity is different from the child’s sex presented at birth.” Proposed House Bill 1205 also provided that “no public authority or official of this state may take any adverse action against a parent for exercising this right.”
That such a simple affirmation of parental rights could not clear a committee in this solidly red state should terrify parents, as it lays bare transgender activists’ plan: use the government to force parents to affirm a false sex for their child, agree to hormone blockers, and accept a transition to their son or daughter’s preferred gender. If parents refuse? Removal of the child from the family, due to alleged medical neglect.
We are already seeing the first two waves of this strategy, according to Dr. Michelle Cretella, executive director of the American College of Pediatricians. The first wave began in 2016 in the divorce and child custody setting, Cretella explained.
“I first began hearing from distraught parents in this situation in 2016 and in 2017, I heard from seven families in as many different states in this situation. In all but one case the child was a 15 year-old girl who never had any sexual identity confusion prior to her parent’s divorce,” Cretella said. “The other case involved 4-year-old triplet boys whose mother desperately wanted a girl. The mother was a psychologist herself and had cross-dressed one of the boys for two years, insisting that it was his idea. In each of the seven cases the guardian ad litems and judges removed the right to medical consent and/or custody from the parent who objected to transition with puberty blockers and hormones.”
The Second Wave
We have since moved on to the second wave, Cretella told The Federalist. “The second wave is going on now, with emergency room staff, therapists, or doctors reporting parents to Child Protective Services who refuse to affirm their child’s false gender.”
More recently, Cretella explains, she has heard from two sets of parents who were accused of being “abusive parents” for refusing to consent to hormone treatments for their teen children. In one case, the parents sought treatment for their son’s suicidal depression. Their son was adopted out of an abusive family, had a long history of depression and anxiety, had been in therapy in the past, was on medications, and never had any sign of gender dysphoria.
Nevertheless, the emergency room physician at the children’s hospital, after interviewing him alone, diagnosed him as “definitely transgender because he insists that he is and that [the parents’] lack of acceptance is causing his suicidal depression. He should be started on puberty blockers and estrogen to transition.”
The mysterious “Q” thought to be a kind of spokesman for a secret military intelligence psyop against the Communist Left, mentioned the Boy Scouts again today, repeating an 8chan “drop” several weeks ago about AWOL supreme court justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
You see, RBG once worked as a radical lawyer and was one of two ghost writers for “Sex Bias in the U.S. Code” a publication of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.
You see, the American Man is a formidable foe and the bolshevik Left cannot defeat him directly. But the American Boy is vulnerable, nearly so much as the American Girl. The Boy Scouts of America was too tempting a target to pass up.
6 Jan 2019 – 12:32:35 PM
Why was she ‘selected’?
Who appointed her?
Remember [her] history.
Ref: 230-page book called Sex Bias in the U.S. Code, published in 1977 by the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.
>Called for the sex-integration of prisons and reformatories so that conditions of imprisonment, security and housing could be equal. She explained, “If the grand design of such institutions is to prepare inmates for return to the community as persons equipped to benefit from and contribute to civil society, then perpetuation of single-sex institutions should be rejected.” (Page 101)
>Called for the sex-integration of Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts because they “perpetuate stereotyped sex roles.” (Page 145)
God bless Vox Day. He is a shining ray of Light in an increasingly dark, insane, evil world.
One of his commenters nails it:
I can’t think of this as anything other than a cancer.
Why even bother with the title, “Boy Scouts?” Answer: Because they plan on destroying it, intentionally, like with all the cultural norms they’ve destroyed such as marriage.
posted by VD @ 2/08/2019 10:41:00 AM
Boys are now excluded from the Boy Scouts:
The Boy Scouts of America welcomed the establishment of Troop 86 in Vulcan and Troop 219 in Helena on February 1st. But these two troops are different — no boys, all girls. The first two of their kind in Central Alabama. With the formation of these two troops, a debate has taken hold. Some think this compromises the central mission of the Boy Scouts, whereas other believe it gives girls new opportunities that they never had before.
It won’t be long before men are excluded from the pulpits of Fake Christian “churches” too. This is why our ancestors didn’t allow women to join men’s groups in the first place.
The Cold Fury blog is just fun to read. I mean that. It is.
BIRMINGHAM, Ala. (WIAT) — The Boy Scouts of America welcomed the establishment of Troop 86 in Vulcan and Troop 219 in Helena on February 1st. But these two troops are different — no boys, all girls. The first two of their kind in Central Alabama.
Uhh, s’cuse me and all, but…isn’t “no boys, all girls” kind of…y’know…discriminatory? Sexist? Unethical? Illegal, even? Moreover: where, pray tell, is the accomodation for our newly-minted 73 Flavors Of Gender™ in all this? If a boy is biologically, genetically, and genitally male but “identifies” as a girl, will he now be allowed to join one of the all-girl troops? If not, why the hell not? Can we start calling these two “Boy Scout” troops “Girl Scouts”? And the biggest question of all: wasn’t the whole idea behind allowing girls into the Boy Scouts to do away with segregation by sex in the first place?
But no, it wasn’t. All this ever was about, really, was to sow chaos and discord, and to above all else to seize control of another venerable American institution in order to, as Iowahawk so astutely said years ago:
1. Identify a respected institution.
2. kill it.
3. gut it.
4. wear its carcass as a skin suit, while demanding respect.#lefties
— David Burge (@iowahawkblog) November 10, 2015