There’s a fascinating series at The Atavisionary on the genetic suicide underway thanks to pressuring our brightest girls into professional careers at the expense of motherhood.
So why is B.S.A. Inc hell bent on forcing them on our sons? Could there be an atavistic gene expression responsible for this?
This lengthy article explains the evolutionary dysgenic pressure of career girlism:
The lesson here is clear. The huge direct costs, opportunity costs, and the inefficiencies created from reserving jobs for women that they aren’t biologically suited for aren’t just unaffordable. Diverting women away from motherhood disproportionately and negatively impacts the fertility of the the most intelligent women . . .
The result in the short term is decreasing the average intelligence of the population and greatly exaggerated sexual dimorphism favoring male intelligence in the long run . . .
If the current environment doesn’t send humanity back to the stone age first, then it will likely create a version of humanity of very smart men and dumb women . . . Lameness of mind will be protective against a loss in fertility for women . . .
So insidious are the effects of deprioritizing motherhood that any culture who implements them is patently suicidal.
There is so much happening and so much baked into the demise of the boy scouts it’s impossible to produce high quality analysis while the job of cataloging the assault for the record remains undone. But clearly all parties can admit the boy scouting movement was the last place for boys to be masculine in an increasingly pozzed American society.